|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This site is run by MySpace Volunteers: Managing Editor: Jennifer Landry..News Editor: Shirley Richardson....VISIT OUR MySpace PAGE: myspace.com/MS_News_Channel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Friday, April 18BREAKING NEWS: AAN: Monoclonal Antibodies Shine in Relapsing-Remitting MS but Not All to Same Degree - in Meeting Coverage, AAN from MedPage TodayThree monoclonal antibodies in development for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis show promise, but alemtuzumab (Campath) appears to be leading the pack, researchers reported here. Once-yearly alemtuzumab reduced relapse risk by 74% and risk of accumulation of disability by 71% compared with standard interferon (both P<0.0001), reported Alasdair Coles, Ph.D., of the University of Cambridge in England, and colleagues, here at the American Academy of Neurology meeting. The benefit continued for two years after the last dose in a subset of patients, according to three-year data from a randomized trial. Other monoclonal antibodies, including daclizumab (Zenapax) and rituximab (Rituxan, MabThera), also looked promising in studies presented here. However, the improvements with alemtuzumab were "probably greater than anything else that's currently on the market or any of the drugs that are being looked at," said Lily Jung, M.D., of the Swedish Neuroscience Institute in Seattle, who commented on the studies. The specific targets of the monoclonal antibodies may account for the differences, Dr. Coles said. Daclizumab is targeted against CD25 on T cells and rituximab is targeted to B cells, but alemtuzumab impacts both types of lymphocytes. "We think one reason why our efficacy is so much better than other more selective monoclonal antibodies is because it has this sort of broad range of action," he said. The phase II CAMMS223 trial included 334 patients with early, active relapsing-remitting disease. Participants were randomized to 44 mcg beta interferon-1a (Rebif) injections three times a week or to once-a-year treatment with either 12 or 24 mg intravenous alemtuzumab delivered every day for five days at baseline and then daily for three days at months 12 and 24. Cumulative relapse rates continued to diverge in favor of alemtuzumab through three years of follow-up for a 74% risk reduction (annualized relapse rate 0.10 versus 0.36, P<0.0001). The load of T2 lesions seen on MRI were reduced to a greater degree with the monoclonal antibody (-16.45 versus -13.3%, P=0.005) and T1 cerebral volume fell less with alemtuzumab as well (-0.5% versus -1.8%, P=0.049). The continued effects were notable because only 46 patients in the alemtuzumab groups received therapy at the 24-month stage. For most participants, dosing was suspended when one patient died of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) on treatment. ITP was seen in six of 216 patients on alemtuzumab and one of 107 patients on interferon, but all other cases were identified early and treated successfully if needed. Thyroid events were also elevated with the drug but could be monitored and easily treated, Dr. Coles said. Dr. Jung agreed that neither of the more serious adverse events were a deal breaker for the drug, because both can be monitored unlike the progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy issues seen with natalizumab (Tysabri). Rather, she was impressed by the reversion of disability in the alemtuzumab group. Mean scores on the Expanded Disability Status Scale at three years decreased 0.39 points with the monoclonal antibody compared with an increase of 0.38 for the interferon group (P<0.0001). "We believe this to be unprecedented," Dr. Coles said. Long dosing intervals may be another advantage. Although patients will likely need two cycles of therapy, they may be able to go for three to five years thereafter without treatment, Dr. Coles said. "I think it's a significantly easier treatment for patients," Dr. Coles said. "That's potentially even more acceptable than a daily tablet because you can forget about your illness." For daclizumab, though, treatment will likely have to be given long term because of a rapid loss of efficacy after discontinuation, said Michael D. Kaufman, M.D., of the Carolinas Medical Center in Charlotte, N.C., and colleagues. Their phase II CHOICE study included 230 relapsing-remitting MS patients randomized to 20 weeks of treatment with beta interferon plus placebo, daclizumab 1 mg/kg, or daclizumab 2 mg/kg. For the previously reported primary endpoint findings, new or enlarged gadolinium-enhancing lesions were 25% fewer at 24 weeks with lower dose daclizumab and 72% fewer with the higher dose compared with placebo (3.6 and 1.3 versus 4.8, P=0.514 and P=0.004, respectively). However, these benefits faded within 10 to 20 weeks after stopping treatment. During the 48-week observation phase of the study, the number of new enhancing lesions seen on MRI at week 34 was not significantly different between treatments although there were 56% more with 1 mg/kg and 23% fewer with 2 mg/kg daclizumab compared with placebo (3.56 and 1.77 versus 2.29, P=0.22 and P=0.49, respectively). In another small study, rituximab reduced the frequency of inflammatory brain lesions and relapses through 72 weeks, reported Amit Bar-Or, M.D., of McGill University in Montreal, and colleagues. Their phase I, open-label trial included 26 patients with relapsing-remitting MS given in two courses of two 1,000-mg rituximab infusions six months apart. Patients had rapid, sustained B cell depletion through 48 weeks followed by partial recovery by week 72. Reductions in gadolinium-enhancing lesions and the number and volume of new T2 lesions were rapid, starting at week four, and sustained through week 72. Relapses were also reduced over 72 weeks compared with the year prior to study treatment. Although how these monoclonal antibodies will play out for clinical use remains to be seen, these findings suggest that alemtuzumab would be used as the initial therapy for newly diagnosed patients with the other agents serving as options for patients with a poor response to other therapies, Dr. Jung said. [Note that these studies were published as abstracts and presented orally at a conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.] Tuesday, April 15Genentech, Biogen's Rituxan Medicine Fails to Slow MS (Update3)
Genentech Inc. and Biogen Idec Inc.'s cancer drug Rituxan failed to slow the disabling effects of the most difficult-to-treat form of multiple sclerosis in a large clinical trial.
Rituxan didn't reach its main goal of slowing disability for people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis after almost two years of treatment, compared with a placebo, the companies said in a statement. If the trial had succeeded, it would have made Rituxan the first drug to work against the primary progressive form of MS, or PPMS. Rituxan, a blood-cancer drug that's also approved for rheumatoid arthritis, generated $2.29 billion in U.S. sales in 2007. It is designed to work by killing inflammatory B cells, a different approach than approved MS drugs. About 400,000 people in the U.S. have MS, and one in 10 have the primary progressive form that gradually damages nerve fibers over time without remissions, according to the National MS Society. ``While the primary results are not what we had hoped, we continue to believe in the potential of B cell therapy for patients living with MS,'' said Michael Panzara, Biogen's vice president and chief medical officer of its neurology strategic business unit. Genentech, majority-owned by Switzerland's Roche Holding AG, fell 63 cents, or less than 1 percent, to $74.06 at 4 p.m. on the New York Stock Exchange. Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Biogen, a co-promoter of the drug, rose $1.21, or 2 percent to $64.93 on the Nasdaq Stock Market. Revenue Opportunity ``This would have presented a revenue opportunity of more than 500 million Swiss francs for Roche but was not included in our model or consensus estimates,'' Deutsche Bank analysts including Michael Leuchten said in a note to investors today. ``PPMS is a tough part of MS to treat and nothing has worked in this setting so far.'' Multiple sclerosis is diagnosed when the body's immune system goes awry and begins attacking the fatty insulating tissue around nerve fibers, called myelin, according to the National MS Society. The Rituxan trial, called Olympus, followed 439 patients for two years after they took an infusion of Rituxan or a placebo. Patients took a repeat course of Rituxan every six months, said Craig Smith, neurology lead clinical scientist in the immunology department at Genentech, in a telephone interview before the announcement. Side Effects Patients were monitored for the status of their disability, to see, for example, whether they were losing their ability to walk, see clearly, or maintain strength in their arms, Smith said. A secondary goal of the study looked at whether the drug reduced brain lesions. More patients had serious side effects on Rituxan than on placebo, Genentech and Biogen said. The rate of serious side effects was about 16.4 percent in the Rituxan group, compared with 13.6 percent on placebo. About 4.5 percent of Rituxan patients had serious infections, compared with 1 percent on placebo. There was some evidence that the drug was working biologically, although the companies didn't specify how much in the statement. Genentech and Biogen plan to continue analyzing the results and submit them at a future medical meeting, the companies said. Double Vision People in the trial were about 48 years old on average, and had been diagnosed with primary progressive MS four to 10 years before enrolling in the study, Smith said. They entered the study with an average disability score of 4 on a scale of 1 to 10, meaning they lacked some coordination, or had some double vision or weakness, although were still able to walk without assistance, he said. Previously, Rituxan was studied for patients with the most common form of MS, the relapsing, remitting form. That study, called Hermes, found that one in five patients on Rituxan relapsed, while twice as many on placebo had a recurrence in a 48-week clinical trial, according to research published in February in the New England Journal of Medicine. Existing drugs, including Biogen's Avonex, Bayer AG's Betaseron, Merck KGaA's Rebif and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.'s Copaxone, work differently than Rituxan by blunting the attack of immune system T cells. None of the drugs have shown a benefit for patients with the primary progressive form of the disease, Smith said. Next Steps The market for MS drugs exceeded $5.5 billion in 2006 and is expected to double by 2013, according to market-research firm Frost & Sullivan in New York. Rituxan costs $20,514 a year for two infusions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, said Genentech spokeswoman Nikki Levy. ``Right now we are reviewing all the data from Olympus and determining next steps regarding our development program,'' Levy said yesterday in an e-mail. The company still plans a mid-stage clinical trial of ocrelizumab, a second-generation drug that blocks the same protein on B cells as Rituxan. The newer drug will be studied against the relapsing, remitting form of MS, Levy said. To contact the reporters on this story: Luke Timmerman in San Francisco at ltimmerman@bloomberg.net TYSABRI Significantly Increased the Proportion of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Patients Who are Considered Disease Free for Over Two Years
BIOGEN IDEC AND ELAN PRESENT NEW TYSABRI DATA AT THE 60th ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY
Approximately 26,000 Patients on Commercial and Clinical Therapy Worldwide Additional Analyses Show TYSABRI Significantly Increased the Proportion of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Patients Who are Considered Disease Free for Over Two Years Biogen Idec (NASDAQ: BIIB) and Elan Corporation, plc (NYSE: ELN) today announced new data on the global utilization, safety and overall patient exposure of TYSABRI® (natalizumab). As of the end of March 2008, approximately 26,000 patients were on commercial and clinical therapy worldwide with no cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) reported since re-launch in the U.S. and launch internationally in July 2006. Growth in global utilization plus increasing confidence in the favorable benefit-risk profile of TYSABRI indicate the companies are making great progress toward the goal of 100,000 patients on therapy by year-end 2010. These data were presented today at the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN). "These data suggest that neurologists and patients are increasingly choosing TYSABRI for the treatment of their disease. The significant clinical benefits are established and TYSABRI continues to offer the potential for compelling efficacy and hope for those patients living with MS," said Michael Panzara, MD, MPH, Vice President and Chief Medical Officer, Neurology Strategic Business Unit, Biogen Idec. "Positive outcomes for patients continue to support TYSABRI's strength as a valuable treatment for multiple sclerosis patients in more than 30 countries around the world. We are also excited that patients with Crohn's Disease are now enrolling in the TOUCH program and beginning to receive TYSABRI treatment in the U.S.," said Gordon Francis, MD, Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development, Elan. According to data available as of the end of March 2008: In the U.S., approximately 15,300 patients were on TYSABRI therapy commercially and approximately 2,750 physicians have prescribed the therapy; Outside of the U.S., more than 10,200 patients were on TYSABRI therapy commercially; In global clinical trials, more than 600 patients were on TYSABRI therapy; and There have been no cases of PML since re-launch in the US and launch internationally in July 2006. Cumulatively, in the combined clinical trial and post-marketing settings: More than 36,700 patients have been treated with TYSABRI; and Of those patients, over 9,900 have received at least one year of TYSABRI therapy and more than 3,600 patients have been on therapy for 18 months or longer. UPDATE: Rituxan Drug Fails In Key Multiple Sclerosis Trial
BOSTON (Dow Jones) -- A late-stage clinical trial of oncology drug Rituxan failed to show it was effective in treating a certain type of multiple sclerosis, according to Genentech Inc. and Biogen Idec Inc.
Late Monday, Genentech (DNA) and Biogen (BIIB) said that in a Phase II/III trial, Rituxan didn't show the antibody-based medication could effectively slow the progression of primary-progressive multiple sclerosis, or PPMS. The companies added that currently there are no effective treatments for PPMS, a particularly hard to treat form of the disease. Rituxan is already approved for the treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis. Biogen Iden markets Avonex, one of the world's best-selling medications for treating multiple sclerosis. The company also co-markets with Elan Corp. (ELN) Tysabri as a multiple sclerosis therapy. Genentech, a publicly traded division of Swiss conglomerate Roche, is a leading developer of oncology medications. Biogen Iden markets Avonex, one of the world's best-selling medications for treating multiple sclerosis. The company also co-markets with Elan Corp. (ELN) Tysabri as a multiple sclerosis therapy. Drug Fails to Slow Nerve Damage - New York Times
Genentech and Biogen Idec’s cancer drug Rituxan failed to slow the disabling effects of the most difficult form of multiple sclerosis in a large clinical trial, the companies said Monday.
Rituxan failed to reach its main goal of slowing disability for people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis after almost two years of treatment, compared with a placebo, the companies said. If the trial had succeeded, it would have made Rituxan the first drug to work against the primary progressive form of multiple sclerosis. Rituxan, a blood-cancer drug that is also approved for rheumatoid arthritis, generated $2.29 billion in sales in the United States in 2007. It is designed to work by killing inflammatory B cells, a different approach from approved multiple sclerosis drugs. About 400,000 people in the United States have multiple sclerosis, and one in 10 have the primary progressive form that gradually damages nerve fibers over time without remissions, according to the National MS Society. ”While the primary results are not what we had hoped, we continue to believe in the potential of B cell therapy for patients living with MS,” said Michael Panzara, Biogen’s vice president and chief medical officer of its neurology strategic business unit. The companies plan to continue analyzing the results and submit them at a medical meeting, the companies said. Monday, April 14Co-Payments Go Way Up for Drugs With High Prices - New York Times
Health insurance companies are rapidly adopting a new pricing system for very expensive drugs, asking patients to pay hundreds and even thousands of dollars for prescriptions for medications that may save their lives or slow the progress of serious diseases.
With the new pricing system, insurers abandoned the traditional arrangement that has patients pay a fixed amount, like $10, $20 or $30 for a prescription, no matter what the drug’s actual cost. Instead, they are charging patients a percentage of the cost of certain high-priced drugs, usually 20 to 33 percent, which can amount to thousands of dollars a month. The system means that the burden of expensive health care can now affect insured people, too. No one knows how many patients are affected, but hundreds of drugs are priced this new way. They are used to treat diseases that may be fairly common, including multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, hemophilia, hepatitis C and some cancers. There are no cheaper equivalents for these drugs, so patients are forced to pay the price or do without. Insurers say the new system keeps everyone’s premiums down at a time when some of the most innovative and promising new treatments for conditions like cancer and rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis can cost $100,000 and more a year. But the result is that patients may have to spend more for a drug than they pay for their mortgages, more, in some cases, than their monthly incomes. The system, often called Tier 4, began in earnest with Medicare drug plans and spread rapidly. It is now incorporated into 86 percent of those plans. Some have even higher co-payments for certain drugs, a Tier 5. Now Tier 4 is also showing up in insurance that people buy on their own or acquire through employers, said Dan Mendelson of Avalere Health, a research organization in Washington. It is the fastest-growing segment in private insurance, Mr. Mendelson said. Five years ago it was virtually nonexistent in private plans, he said. Now 10 percent of them have Tier 4 drug categories. Private insurers began offering Tier 4 plans in response to employers who were looking for ways to keep costs down, said Karen Ignagni, president of America’s Health Insurance Plans, which represents most of the nation’s health insurers. When people who need Tier 4 drugs pay more for them, other subscribers in the plan pay less for their coverage. But the new system sticks seriously ill people with huge bills, said James Robinson, a health economist at the University of California, Berkeley. “It is very unfortunate social policy,” Dr. Robinson said. “The more the sick person pays, the less the healthy person pays.” Traditionally, the idea of insurance was to spread the costs of paying for the sick. “This is an erosion of the traditional concept of insurance,” Mr. Mendelson said. “Those beneficiaries who bear the burden of illness are also bearing the burden of cost.” And often, patients say, they had no idea that they would be faced with such a situation. It happened to Robin Steinwand, 53, who has multiple sclerosis. In January, shortly after Ms. Steinwand renewed her insurance policy with Kaiser Permanente, she went to refill her prescription for Copaxone. She had been insured with Kaiser for 17 years through her husband, a federal employee, and had had no complaints about the coverage. She had been taking Copaxone since multiple sclerosis was diagnosed in 2000, buying 30 days’ worth of the pills at a time. And even though the drug costs $1,900 a month, Kaiser required only a $20 co-payment. Not this time. When Ms. Steinwand went to pick up her prescription at a pharmacy near her home in Silver Spring, Md., the pharmacist handed her a bill for $325. There must be a mistake, Ms. Steinwand said. So the pharmacist checked with her supervisor. The new price was correct. Kaiser’s policy had changed. Now Kaiser was charging 25 percent of the cost of the drug up to a maximum of $325 per prescription. Her annual cost would be $3,900 and unless her insurance changed or the drug dropped in price, it would go on for the rest of her life. “I charged it, then got into my car and burst into tears,” Ms. Steinwand said. She needed the drug, she said, because it can slow the course of her disease. And she knew she would just have to pay for it, but it would not be easy. “It’s a tough economic time for everyone,” she said. “My son will start college in a year and a half. We are asking ourselves, can we afford a vacation? Can we continue to save for retirement and college?” CLICK BELOW FOR FULL STORY: Co-Payments Go Way Up for Drugs With High Prices - New York Times Sunday, April 13These are the last 100 posts I've made on my MySpace page...
Wednesday, April 9Adherence to the immunomodulatory drugs for multip...[Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008] - PubMed Result
(CLICK ON HEADLINE FOR FULL STORY)
BACKGROUND: Long-term immunomodulatory drug (IMD) treatment is now common in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, predictors of adherence are not well understood; past studies lacked lifestyle factors such as alcohol use and predictors of missed doses have not been evaluated. We examined both levels of non-adherence-stopping IMD and missing doses. . CONCLUSIONS: There were few strong predictors of missed doses, although people with MS consuming more alcoholic drinks per session are at a higher risk of missing doses. Divergent factors influenced the two levels of non-adherence indicating the need for a multifaceted approach to improving IMD adherence. In addition, missed doses should be assessed and incorporated into clinical trial design and clinical practice as poor adherers could impact on clinical outcomes. Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. PMID: 18395883 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher Tuesday, April 8Shares in cannabis drug firm fall 26% after it scraps trial results | Business | The GuardianSunday, April 6Videos:Videos:B-cell depletion with rituximab in relapsing-remit...[N Engl J Med. 2008] - PubMed Result
B-cell depletion with rituximab in relapsing-remit...[N Engl J Med. 2008] - PubMed Result
Department of Neurology, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0114, USA. hausers@neurology.ucsf.edu BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that B lymphocytes are involved in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis, and they may be a therapeutic target. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody, selectively targets and depletes CD20+ B lymphocytes. METHODS: In a phase 2, double-blind, 48-week trial involving 104 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, we assigned 69 patients to receive 1000 mg of intravenous rituximab and 35 patients to receive placebo on days 1 and 15. The primary end point was the total count of gadolinium-enhancing lesions detected on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the brain at weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24. Clinical outcomes included safety, the proportion of patients who had relapses, and the annualized rate of relapse. RESULTS: As compared with patients who received placebo, patients who received rituximab had reduced counts of total gadolinium-enhancing lesions at weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24 (P<0.001) and of total new gadolinium-enhancing lesions over the same period (P<0.001); these results were sustained for 48 weeks (P<0.001). As compared with patients in the placebo group, the proportion of patients in the rituximab group with relapses was significantly reduced at week 24 (14.5% vs. 34.3%, P=0.02) and week 48 (20.3% vs. 40.0%, P=0.04). More patients in the rituximab group than in the placebo group had adverse events within 24 hours after the first infusion, most of which were mild-to-moderate events; after the second infusion, the numbers of events were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: A single course of rituximab reduced inflammatory brain lesions and clinical relapses for 48 weeks. This trial was not designed to assess long-term safety or to detect uncommon adverse events. The data provide evidence of B-cell involvement in the pathophysiology of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00097188 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2008 Massachusetts Medical Society. Rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosi...[Ann Neurol. 2008] - PubMed Result
Rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosi...[Ann Neurol. 2008] - PubMed Result
Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. amit.bar-or@mcgill.ca We evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and activity of B-cell depletion with rituximab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, receiving two courses of rituximab 6 months apart, and followed for a total of 72 weeks. No serious adverse events were noted; events were limited to mild-to-moderate infusion-associated events, which tended to decrease with subsequent infusions. Infections were also mild or moderate, and none led to withdrawal. Fewer new gadolinium-enhancing or T2 lesions were seen starting from week 4 and through week 72. An apparent reduction in relapses was also observed over the 72 weeks compared with the year before therapy. PMID: 18383069 [PubMed - in process] The Meaning of Women's Experiences of Living With ...[Health Care Women Int. 2008] - PubMed Result
The Meaning of Women's Experiences of Living With ...[Health Care Women Int. 2008] - PubMed Result
We conducted a qualitative inquiry in order to describe the meaning of women's experiences of living with multiple sclerosis (MS). Multiple sclerosis is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. The majority of persons living with MS are women. Living with MS has been described as difficult because of the uncertainty of the illness. Ten women with MS were interviewed and the interviews were analyzed with a phenomenological hermeneutic interpretation. In this study, we suggest that the meaning of living with MS for women can be understood as trying to maintain power and living with an unrecognizable body. The bodies of women with MS serve as hindrances in everyday life. Bodily changes evident to others impose feelings of being met in a different way, which can be understood as an expression of a violated dignity. At the same time, the women with MS struggle to protect their dignity. PMID: 18389436 [PubMed - in process] Preserving a Fundamental Sense: Balance![]() By JANE E. BRODY Scott McCredie is a Seattle-based health and science writer who says he “discovered” what he calls “the lost sense” of balance after he watched in horror as his 67-year-old father tumbled off a boulder and disappeared from sight during a hike in the Cascades.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||